Skip to Content

1792 Small Batch vs 1792 Full Proof: Which Wins?

Discover the differences between 1792 Small Batch vs 1792 Full Proof in this head to head comparison and decide which Bourbon is better for You!

1792 Small Batch

1792-small-batch
NoseCharred oak, banana, rye spice
PalateCinnamon, oak, banana, ripe fruit
FinishMedium-length, cinnamon, pepper, oak
Alcohol content94 proof (47.5% ABV)
How to drinkAdd water, cocktails
Similar toWoodford Reserve, Elijah Craig Small Batch

1792 is not the year in which this distillery was founded but when Kentucky was recognized as a state.

Buffalo Trace owns 1792 Bourbon but is crafted at its own distillery in Barton.

The nose is rich in burnt oak, banana with a light touch of green apple and rye spice. It comes together to be somewhat earthy and creamy as you let it sit on the glass.

Palate is smooth with hints of cinnamon moving across the mouth before gradually intensifying and being joined by bitter dry oak notes.

There are notes of banana and ripe fruit, but they are immediately overwhelmed by the spice leaving this dram a bit one dimensional and fairly unbalanced.

The finish has a medium-length with a lingering cinnamon spiciness and dry oak and is a bit warm but nothing off-putting.

1792 Small Batch is a little forgettable perhaps, yet easy to drink without thinking about it. It has a few nice tasting notes, but out of balance and not quite developed.

There are a few facts worth knowing about 1792 Small Batch:

  • Prior to 2013 this whiskey had an 8 year age statement.
  • The bourbon carries a high proportion of rye in the mash.
  • 1792 celebrates the year in which Kentucky was recognized as a state.
  • Double Gold Medal at the 2011 San Francisco World Spirits Competition.
  • Earned 95 points, tying Pappy Van Winkle’s 23 at the Ultimate Spirits Challenge in 2012.

1792 Full Proof

1792-full-proof
NoseCaramel, vanilla, ethanol
PalateRipe fruit, vanilla, caramel, oak
FinishMedium-length, caramel, oak spice
Alcohol content94 proof (47.5% ABV)
How to drinkAdd water, cocktails
Similar toWild Turkey Rare Breed

The nose is mostly sweet with notes of caramel and vanilla with a bit of alcohol heat that is expected from the high proof.

On the palate, you get a good creamy body with tons of vanilla and caramel sweetness up-front with a bit of warmth that smooths out as you let it develop.

The finish is not as long as you would expect from a full proof offering, rich in fruity notes with a peppery note and moderately warm.

The best way of drinking the 1792 Full Proof is with a large ice ball as it tunes down the pepper and the heat making, releasing some sweetness as ice melts becoming much better and way easier to drink.

1792 is a good bourbon, rich in sweetness but not the smoothest although you can easily tame it with ice making it entirely satisfying.

Remember that it’s easier to tune-down a flavorful spirit than to bring one back from the dead.

Learn more about this brand by reading my post: Discover the Best 1792 Whiskey where I rank every release.

There are a few facts worth knowing about 1792 Full Proof:

  • Bottled at 125 proof.
  • Not chill-filtered but filtered through a plate and frame filter; this provides a fuller flavor.
  • Does not show an age statement but is typically aged for 8 years.
  • The warehouses in which it is aged are exposed to direct sunlight.
  • Earned a Silver medal at the 2018 San Francisco World Spirits Competition.
  • 93 points at the 2018 Ultimate Spirits Challenge.

1792 Small Batch vs Full Proof: Price comparison

Prices are approximate and stated in USD:

WhiskeyPrice
1792 Small Batch$33
1792 Full Proof$58

1792 Small Batch vs 1792 Full Proof: Which is better?

Full Proof is remarkably better

WhiskeySmall BatchFull Proof
Nose
Body
Palate
Finish
Value
  • Full Proof is way better than the Small Batch, as it is bolder, creamier and entirely better rounded.
  • Is it worth the surcharge? Yes, you get a better deal as you get a more complex and deeper pour, perhaps not the smoothest but it becomes supremely drinkable when adding a large ice ball tuning down the heat and the pepper.
  • As a general rule Full Proof spirits are better as they were not diluted with water before bottling. This provides more body and bolder flavors.

Non chill-filtered spirits are usually a better deal.

Chill-filtering prevents the liquid from becoming hazy but this process also removes certain molecules that provide additional tasting notes.

Hence the reason why some die-hard aficionados only buy this type of whiskeys.

1792 vs Very Old Barton: Which Bourbon Wins?

Tuesday 15th of November 2022

[…] 1792 Full Proof, 1792 Small Batch […]

1792 Small Batch vs Bulleit Bourbon: Which Bourbon Wins?

Wednesday 2nd of November 2022

[…] in Bond, Full Proof, Single […]

1792 Small Batch vs Eagle Rare: Which Bourbon Wins?

Tuesday 1st of November 2022

[…] Also read: 1792 Small Batch vs 1792 Full Proof: Discover the Better! […]

1792 Small Batch vs Four Roses Small Batch: Which Wins?

Monday 31st of October 2022

[…] Single Barrel, Bottled in Bond, Full Proof […]

1792 Small Batch vs 1792 Bottled in Bond: Which Whiskey Wins?

Sunday 29th of May 2022

[…] Also read: 1792 Small Batch vs 1792 Full Proof: Discover the Better! […]