Discover the differences between 1792 Small Batch vs 1792 Single Barrel in this in-depth comparison and decide which bourbon is better for You!
1792 Small Batch Bourbon
|Nose||Charred oak, banana, rye spice|
|Palate||Cinnamon, oak, banana, ripe fruit|
|Finish||Medium-length, cinnamon, pepper, oak|
|Alcohol content||94 proof (47% ABV)|
|How to drink||Rocks, cocktails|
|Similar to||Bulleit, Four Roses, Buffalo Trace|
1792 is not the year in which this distillery was founded but when Kentucky was recognized as a state.
Buffalo Trace owns 1792 Bourbon but is crafted at its own distillery in Barton.
The nose is rich in burnt oak, banana with a light touch of green apple and rye spice. It comes together to be somewhat earthy and creamy as you let it sit on the glass.
Palate is smooth with hints of cinnamon moving across the mouth before gradually intensifying and being joined by bitter dry oak notes.
There are notes of banana and ripe fruit, but they are immediately overwhelmed by the spice leaving this dram a bit one dimensional and fairly unbalanced.
The finish has a medium-length with a lingering cinnamon spiciness and dry oak and is a bit warm but nothing off-putting.
1792 Small Batch is a little forgettable perhaps, yet easy to drink without thinking about it. It has a few nice tasting notes, but out of balance and not quite developed.
There are a few facts worth knowing about 1792 Small Batch:
- Prior to 2013 this whiskey had an 8 year age statement.
- The whiskey carries a high proportion of rye in the mash providing a spicy note.
- 1792 celebrates the year in which Kentucky was recognized as a state.
- Double Gold Medal at the 2011 San Francisco World Spirits Competition.
- Earned 95 points, tying Pappy Van Winkle’s 23 at the Ultimate Spirits Challenge in 2012.
1792 Single Barrel
|Nose||Banana, brown sugar, mint|
|Palate||Butterscotch, brine, ripe fruit|
|Finish||Lemon, cherry, cinnamon, brine|
|Alcohol content||98.6 proof (49.3% ABV)|
|How to drink||Add water, Rocks|
|Similar to||Four Roses Single Barrel|
Nose is smooth, with hints of banana, brown sugar and mint.
On the palate, the 1792 Single Barrel displays butterscotch at first, followed by brine and fruity notes and a light hit of allspice. The body has a creamy buttery feel making it quite enjoyable.
The finish is moderately long, with oily heat that lingers in the back of your throat, with hints of lemon, cherry, cinnamon and more brine.
Single Barrel has many flavors in common with the Small Batch while feeling more refined making a solid and smooth easy sipper for any occasion.
It drinks nicely neat. Adding a drop of water releases additional sweetness while tuning down the heat by a notch.
Consider further options by reading my post containing the Best Single Barrel Bourbons.
There are a few facts worth knowing about the 1792 Single Barrel:
- Does not have an age statement but aged for a minimum of 8 years.
- Aged in Warehouse Z, the warmest and most humid on the distillery’s estate in Bardstown, Kentucky.
- Earned a score of 95 points at the 2016 Ultimate Spirits Challenge.
- This brand is owned by the Sazerac Company who owns whiskeys such as Buffalo Trace, Pappy van Winkle, Weller, Blanton’s, Eagle Rare among others but is not crafted at the Buffalo Trace Distillery.
- Crafted at the Barton Distillery established in 1879 in Bardstown, Kentucky.
1792 Small Batch vs Single Barrel: Price comparison
Prices are approximate and stated in USD:
|1792 Small Batch Bourbon||$33|
|1792 Single Barrel||$47|
1792 Small Batch vs 1792 Single Barrel: Which is better?
Single Barrel is an improvement over Small Batch
|Whiskey||Small Batch||Single Barrel|
- Single Barrel is a more refined bourbon than Small Batch.
- The higher proof provides more body, without becoming warm, and providing a more flavorful experience and worth of the surcharge.
- The 1792 Small Batch is not bad, just that too generic and completely unremarkable.
Learn more about this brand by reading my post: Discover the Best 1792 Bourbon where I rank every bottle.
I am a bar and liquor shop owner in Oaxaca, Mexico where I have tasted hundreds of different spirits; perhaps more than I should!