Skip to Content

1792 Small Batch vs Elijah Craig Small Batch: Which Wins?

Discover the differences between 1792 Small Batch vs Elijah Craig Small Batch in this in-depth comparison and decide which Bourbon is better for You!

1792 Small Batch

1792-small-batch
NoseCharred oak, banana, rye spice
PalateCinnamon, oak, banana, ripe fruit
FinishMedium-length, cinnamon, pepper, oak
Alcohol content94 proof (47% ABV)
How to drinkRocks, cocktails
Similar toBuffalo Trace, Woodford Reserve

1792 is not the year in which this distillery was founded but when Kentucky was recognized as a state.

Buffalo Trace owns 1792 Bourbon but is crafted at its own distillery in Barton.

The nose is rich in burnt oak, banana with a light touch of green apple and rye spice. It comes together to be somewhat earthy and creamy as you let it sit on the glass.

Palate is smooth with hints of cinnamon moving across the mouth before gradually intensifying and being joined by bitter dry oak notes.

There are notes of banana and ripe fruit, but they are immediately overwhelmed by the spice leaving this dram a bit one dimensional and fairly unbalanced.

The finish has a medium-length with a lingering cinnamon spiciness and dry oak and is a bit warm but nothing off-putting.

1792 Small Batch is a little forgettable perhaps, yet easy to drink without thinking about it. It has a few nice tasting notes, but out of balance and not quite developed.

Read my post: Discover the Best 1792 bottle where you will find better options than the Small Batch which is not my jam.

There are a few facts worth knowing about 1792 Small Batch:

  • Prior to 2013 this whiskey had an 8 year age statement.
  • The whiskey carries a high proportion of rye in the mash providing a spicy note.
  • 1792 celebrates the year in which Kentucky was recognized as a state.
  • Double Gold Medal at the 2011 San Francisco World Spirits Competition.
  • Earned 95 points, tying Pappy 23 at the Ultimate Spirits Challenge in 2012.

Elijah Craig Small Batch

elijah-craig-small-batch
NoseWood, chocolate, cinnamon, clove
PalateChocolate, wood, butterscotch, citrus
FinishOak spice, cinnamon, clove, black pepper, vanilla
Alcohol content94 proof (47% ABV)
How to drinkRocks, cocktails
Similar toFour Roses Small Batch, Bulleit, Knob Creek

Nose offers oak aroma at first, followed by a hint of chocolate, cinnamon and clove.

On the palate, you get oak spice up-front, with a hint of bitter chocolate, butterscotch, vanilla and a tad of citrus.

There is warmth on the finish as you get a hit of ethanol and a spicy bite rich in oak spice, cinnamon, black pepper and clove with some butterscotch sweetness coming late to the party.

Elijah Craig has a nice nose, a good taste but it lets you down on the finish as it feels warm and spicy.

It becomes better when adding a drop of water as it becomes sweeter and loses some of the heat along the peppery bite.

Is not a bad bourbon by any means, barely making it to the sipper category but definitely needs more persistence than the average bourbon in this price range.

Learn more about this brand by reading my post: Discover the Best Elijah Craig Bourbon where I rank every release.

There are a few facts worth knowing about Elijah Craig:

  • Elijah Craig is credited as the first distiller to use heavily charred casks to age bourbon.
  • It is made from a mash bill comprised of 78% corn, 10% rye and 12% malted barley. 
  • It is bottled by blending no less than 200 casks of maturing bourbon, each of which was rested in a Kentucky rickhouse for a minimum of 8 years.
  • This whiskey previously had an age statement of 12 years but in 2016 the age statement was removed to extend its availability.
  • The distiller also increased the maximum number of barrels used per batch from 100 to 200.

1792 vs Elijah Craig: Price comparison

Prices are approximate and stated in USD:

WhiskeyPrice
1792 Small Batch$33
Elijah Craig Small Batch$34

1792 Small Batch vs Elijah Craig Small Batch: Which is better?

Flip a coin

Whiskey1792Elijah Craig
Nose
Body
Palate
Finish
Value
  • Elijah Craig is marginally better (by a close margin) than the 1792 Small Batch.
  • They both have the same flaws in common as they let you down on the finish, but the Elijah Craig can be saved with a drop or two of water as it becomes sweeter while tuning down the spice and heat.
  • Both whiskeys barely made it to the sipping bourbon category, but they are there nonetheless.
  • But if you are looking for an overly smooth dram these might not be the best choices.

WIthin the Small Batch category the Four Roses Bourbon makes a better option.

Elijah Craig vs Jim Beam: (Which Bourbon Wins?)

Friday 13th of January 2023

[…] Maker’s Mark, Jack Daniel’s, 1792 Small Batch […]

Buffalo Trace vs 1792 Small Batch: Which Bourbon Wins?

Thursday 3rd of November 2022

[…] Woodford Reserve, Elijah Craig […]

Elijah Craig Small Batch vs Larceny Small Batch: Which Wins?

Wednesday 2nd of November 2022

[…] Roses, 1792, Wild Turkey […]

1792 Small Batch vs Maker's Mark: Discover Which Whiskey Wins?

Tuesday 1st of November 2022

[…] Also read: 1792 Small Batch vs Elijah Craig Small Batch: Discover the Better! […]

1792 Small Batch vs 1792 Full Proof: Which Bourbon Wins?

Monday 31st of October 2022

[…] Woodford Reserve, Elijah Craig Small Batch […]