Discover the differences between 1792 Small Batch vs Maker’s Mark in this head to head comparison and decide which Bourbon is better for You!
1792 Small Batch
|Nose||Charred oak, banana, rye spice|
|Palate||Cinnamon, oak, banana, ripe fruit|
|Finish||Medium-length, cinnamon, pepper, oak|
|Alcohol content||94 proof (47% ABV)|
|How to drink||Rocks, cocktails|
|Similar to||Buffalo Trace, Single Barrel, Bottled in Bond|
1792 is not the year in which this distillery was founded but when Kentucky was recognized as a state.
Buffalo Trace owns 1792 Bourbon but is crafted at its own distillery in Barton.
The nose is rich in burnt oak, banana with a light touch of green apple and rye spice. It comes together to be somewhat earthy and creamy as you let it sit on the glass.
Palate is smooth with hints of cinnamon moving across the mouth before gradually intensifying and being joined by bitter dry oak notes.
There are notes of banana and ripe fruit, but they are immediately overwhelmed by the spice leaving this dram a bit one dimensional and fairly unbalanced.
The finish has a medium-length with a lingering cinnamon spiciness and dry oak and is a bit warm but nothing off-putting.
1792 Small Batch is a little forgettable perhaps, yet easy to drink without thinking about it. It has a few nice tasting notes, but out of balance and not quite developed.
Read my post: Discover the Best 1792 Whiskey where you will find better options than the Small Batch which is not my jam.
There are a few facts worth knowing about 1792 Small Batch:
- Prior to 2013 this whiskey had an 8 year age statement.
- The whiskey carries a high proportion of rye in the mash providing a spicy note.
- 1792 celebrates the year in which Kentucky was recognized as a state.
- Double Gold Medal at the 2011 San Francisco World Spirits Competition.
- Earned 95 points, tying Pappy 23 at the Ultimate Spirits Challenge in 2012.
|Nose||Caramel, vanilla, fruity notes|
|Palate||Sweet, nutty, baking spice, bread-like flavor|
|Finish||Honeyed, smooth and a bit of spice|
|Alcohol content||90 proof (45% ABV)|
|How to drink||Add water, rocks|
|Similar to||Bulleit, Jim Beam, Jack Daniel’s|
The nose has a nail polish note that fades into vanilla and cherry as you let it develop in the glass.
On the palate Maker’s Mark delivers vanilla, caramel, cherry and honey providing a pleasant mouthfeel.
The finish has a moderate length, is sweet with very little warmth and just a dash of black pepper.
Adding a drop of water makes it taste like a Tootsie Pop, while tuning down the spicy note making it easier to sip.
Maker’s Mark is a well-rounded and enjoyable bourbon without any bold flavors. Nothing stands-out but there are no off-putting notes as it is nicely balanced, yet with enough body.
It makes a good entry-level bottle to those new to bourbon or liquors in general or a nice “everyday whisky” for those looking for a non-challenging sipper.
I’m not fond of using wheated bourbons as mixers as I feel they lack the punch to deliver tasty cocktails making me prefer a classic rye whiskey for an Old Fashioned.
I have compiled a list of bourbons similar to Maker’s Mark that you should consider if you want to explore further options.
There are few facts about Maker’s Mark worth knowing:
- Maker’s Mark is made from 70% corn, 16% red wheat, and 14% malted barley.
- While most whiskeys age for a set amount of time, Maker’s is bottled when the tasters call it to be ready; that is between 6 and 7 years.
- This one of the few whiskey brands in the United States that uses “whisky” instead of “whiskey” in its name due to the founders Scottish heritage.
- Maker’s bottles stand out from the rest due to the red wax seal that is still made by hand nowadays.
- Maker’s Mark is owned by Beam Suntory, a Japanese drinks giant who also holds Jim Beam, although they are crafted at different distilleries.
1792 Small Batch vs Maker’s Mark: Price comparison
Prices are approximate and stated in USD.
|1792 Small Batch||$33|
1792 Small Batch vs Maker’s Mark: Which is better?
Maker’s Mark is easier to like
|Whiskey||1792 Small Batch||Maker’s Mark|
- If you are new to whiskey or liquors in general you will be better served with the Maker’s Mark.
- This pour is a good entry-level offering as it is a sweet wheated bourbon, with very little burn that drinks nicely neat or rocks.
- 1792 is a bit unbalanced, rich in rye spice and oak with a bit of a bite making an option for those who have a penchant for a bit of roughness in their drinks.
- 1792 is not bad by any means, but there are better options within its family.
I am a bar and liquor shop owner in Oaxaca, Mexico where I have tasted hundreds of different spirits; perhaps more than I should!