Skip to Content

1792 Bottled in Bond vs Very Old Barton 100 Proof: Head to Head!

Discover the differences between 1792 Bottled in Bond vs Very Old Barton 100 Proof in this in-depth comparison and decide which bourbon is better for You!

1792 Bottled in Bond

1792-bottled-in-bond
NoseFruity, baking spice, bubble gum
PalateCaramel, ripe fruit, vanilla, oak
FinishGreen apple, cherry, oak
Alcohol content100 proof (50% ABV)
How to drinkAdd water, rocks
Similar to1792 Full Proof, 1792 Small Batch

On the nose I get fruity notes, but rapidly overtaken with fresh baked cinnamon raisin bread and a hint of bubble gum.

On the palate there is some sweetness up front like bubble gum that has been in your mouth for a while.

Also some rye spice, vanilla and cherry in the mid palate with a faint oak note at the end along green apple and cherry and touch of spice.

Bottled in Bond feels better balanced than Small Batch as the sweetness does not get overwhelmed by the oak and spice.

The finish is deep, well rounded, and satisfying making a better sipper.

It displays a good texture as the body is creamy with very little warmth despite the additional proof making 1792 Bottled in Bond a good bourbon.

This whiskey meets the requirements to be a bottled in bond whiskey, that is: distilled in one season from one distiller, aged at least four years, and bottled at 100 proof.

There are a few facts worth knowing about 1792 Small Batch:

  • Prior to 2013 this whiskey had an 8 year age statement (now is 4).
  • The whiskey carries a high proportion of rye in the mash providing a spicy note.
  • 1792 celebrates the year in which Kentucky was recognized as a state.
  • Earned a score of 95 points, tying Pappy Van Winkle 23 at the Ultimate Spirits Challenge in 2012.

Very Old Barton 100 Proof

very-old-barton-100-proof
NoseVanilla, caramel, oak
PalateHoney, vanilla, rye spice
FinishShort, spice and brown sugar
Alcohol content100 proof (50% ABV)
How to drinkAdd water, rocks
Similar toEvan Williams BIB

The nose is faint, with just a light vanilla note, followed by caramel and oak.

On the palate, the Old Barton has a smooth mouthfeel, with notes of honey, vanilla and gentle rye spice. There is a bit of oak spice but just a light touch.

The finish is short-lived, with some rye spice and brown sugar and very little warmth.

Very Old Barton is a smooth tasting bourbon, with notes that remind me of a Graham Cracker. It drinks nicely neat and does not need water nor ice as it goes down easy.

Not the most interesting bourbon on the planet, but its current price makes it quite attractive as whiskeys in this price range tend to have nail polish notes.

There are not many smooth 100 proof bourbons for less less than $20 making it a good option when drinking on a budget.

There are a few facts worth knowing about the Very Old Barton 100:

  • The Old Barton had a 6 year age statement but it was shortened to a mere 4.
  • The mash bill is 75% corn, 15% rye, and 10% malted barley.
  • Named one of the “Best Budget Bourbons” by Serious Eats.
  • “Best Buy Whiskey of the Year” by Whisky Advocate.

What do 1792 Bottled in Bond and Very Old Barton 100 have in common?

They are both crafted at the Barton Distillery

These bourbons are crafted at the Barton Distillery in Bardstown, KY, are aged for 4 years, bottled at 100 proof and presumably use the same mash bill.

Both brands belong the Sazerac Company who owns top bourbon brands, such as Pappy Van Winkle, Weller, Blanton’s and mid-shelf brands like Buffalo Trace and Eagle Rare.

What’s the difference between 1792 and Very Old Barton?

1792 is a bottled in bond release

To be labeled bottled in bond, a spirit must be the product of a single distiller in a single season, aged for a minimum of 4 years in a federally bonded warehouse, and bottled at 100 proof (50% ABV).

Are 1792 and Very Old Barton the same bourbon?

Not the same but very close

On the palate there are subtle differences making the 1792 a more polished version of the Very Old Barton.

I would not say that it is a huge improvement, though.

1792 Bottled in Bond vs Very Old Barton 100 Proof: Price comparison

Prices are approximate and stated in USD:

WhiskeyPrice
1792 Bottled in Bond$46
Very Old Barton 100 Proof$19

1792 Bottled in Bond vs Very Old Barton 100 Proof: Which is better?

1792 tastes somewhat better

Whiskey1792 Bottled in BondVery Old Barton 100 Proof
Nose
Body
Palate
Finish
Value
  • Buy the Old Barton and pocket the difference because these bourbon have subtle differences in tasting notes but there is a considerable rice gap that is not justified.
  • The Old Barton is a champ in terms of value making a a smart buy.

Wild Turkey 101: 7 Best Alternatives & Similar Bourbons

Friday 9th of December 2022

[…] 1792 Small Batch, Very Old Barton […]

Discover the Best 1792 Bourbon: Which 1792 Whiskey should you buy?

Tuesday 6th of December 2022

[…] 1792 Small Batch, Very Old Barton […]

1792 Small Batch vs 1792 Bottled in Bond: Which Bourbon Wins?

Monday 31st of October 2022

[…] 1792 Full Proof, VO Barton […]

Wolcott vs Woodford Reserve: Which Whiskey Wins?

Friday 23rd of September 2022

[…] Bourbon is crafted for Total Wine at the 1792 Barton Distillery, which in turn is owned by… Buffalo […]

Evan Williams Bottled in Bond vs Very Old Barton: Which Wins?

Thursday 14th of July 2022

[…] Very Old Barton is a smooth tasting bourbon, with notes that remind me of a Graham Cracker. It drinks nicely neat and does not need water nor ice as it goes down easy. […]